Bug on Red Nova Dragon

Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Tex Killer
Advanced Member Topic Starter

2012-12-05T00:07:32Z

Hi

Well, Red Nova Dragon's attack-negating effect states that it targets the attacking monster, but one can still use it to negate Obelisk's attack (Obelisk can not be targeted by effects).

Thanks for the work on this awesome game, by the way.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your YGOPRO forum account or Register a new forum account

magmaflood
Member

2012-12-08T07:06:13Z

red nova didn't say target the attacking monster.
when it said "select it" -if those words that confuse you- it means red nova.

Tex Killer
Advanced Member Topic Starter

2012-12-08T11:19:13Z

No.

"When your opponent's monster declares an attack, you can select it, ..."
It is clear that what gets selected is the "opponent's monster" aforementioned.

Also, that is made clear on this link :
"The effect to negate an attack targets the attacking monster"

Percival18
Administration

2012-12-08T12:50:24Z

Yes you are right. I can confirm this a bug after testing on English version of wc 2011.

Just curious: does the ocg version of Red Nova have same ruling?

Edited by user 2012-12-08T12:52:45Z | Reason: Not specified

Read this before requesting support

Read this before posting card bugs

Tex Killer
Advanced Member Topic Starter

2012-12-08T18:10:13Z

There is no mention on the link I've posted before, but I guess it is the same as TCG. Are there any cards with different rulings between TCG and OCG?

Anonymous
Advanced Member

2012-12-08T21:10:13Z

Originally Posted by: Tex Killer

Are there any cards with different rulings between TCG and OCG?

Yeah,here's some cards http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Contradicting_Rulings

Important Information:

The YGOPRO uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close